You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect of Holly Quran Voice With and Without Translation on Stress, Anxiety and Depression During Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Religion and Health, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10943-017-0417-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Batoul Jabbari, Mojgan Mirghafourvand, Fahimeh Sehhatie, Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to investigate the effect of Holy Quran on stress, anxiety and depression in Iranian pregnant women. A total of 168 participants were allocated randomly into three groups. Group I received broadcast of the Holy Quran with translation, group II received broadcast of the Holy Quran without translation, and group III was the control group. After intervention, scores of perceived stress, state anxiety, trait anxiety and depression in group I and group II were significantly lower compared with the control group. The Holly Quran with translation and without it, both are the effective for reducing stress, anxiety and depression during pregnancy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 294 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Researcher | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 134 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 49 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 10% |
| Psychology | 21 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 143 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,831,443
of 25,652,464 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#149
of 1,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,569
of 330,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,652,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.