You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanism for the formation of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Earth Sciences, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11430-013-4773-4 |
| Authors |
YueSi Wang, Li Yao, LiLi Wang, ZiRui Liu, DongSheng Ji, GuiQian Tang, JunKe Zhang, Yang Sun, Bo Hu, JinYuan Xin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 14% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2014.
All research outputs
#1,253,915
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#42
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,320
of 326,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.