↓ Skip to main content

An analytical method for determination of fullerenes and functionalized fullerenes in soils with high performance liquid chromatography and UV detection

Overview of attention for article published in Analytica Chimica Acta, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An analytical method for determination of fullerenes and functionalized fullerenes in soils with high performance liquid chromatography and UV detection
Published in
Analytica Chimica Acta, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.aca.2013.11.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Carboni, Erik Emke, John R. Parsons, Karsten Kalbitz, Pim de Voogt

Abstract

Fullerenes are carbon-based nanomaterials expected to play a major role in emerging nanotechnology and produced at an increasing rate for industrial and household applications. In the last decade a number of novel compounds (i.e. fullerene derivatives) is being introduced into the market and specific analytical methods are needed for analytical purposes as well as environmental and safety issues. In the present work eight fullerenes (C60 and C70) and functionalized fullerenes (C60 and C70 exohedral-derivatives) were selected and a novel liquid chromatographic method was developed for their analysis with UV absorption as a method of detection. The resulting HPLC-UV method is the first one suitable for the analysis of all eight compounds. This method was applied for the analysis of fullerenes added to clayish, sandy and loess top-soils at concentrations of 20, 10 and 5 μg kg(-1) and extracted with a combination of sonication and shaking extraction. The analytical method limits of detection (LoD) and limits of quantification (LoQ) were in the range of 6-10 μg L(-1) and 15-24 μg L(-1) respectively for the analytical solutions. The extraction from soil was highly reproducible with recoveries ranging from 47±5 to 71±4% whereas LoD and LoQ for all soils tested were of 3 μg kg(-1) and 10 μg kg(-1) respectively. No significant difference in the extraction performance was observed depending of the different soil matrices and between the different concentrations. The developed method can be applied for the study of the fate and toxicity of fullerenes in complex matrices at relatively low concentrations and in principle it will be suitable for the analysis of other types of functionalized fullerenes that were not included in this work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 24%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytica Chimica Acta
#5,978
of 7,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,218
of 207,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytica Chimica Acta
#49
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,520 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.