↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic Assessment Promotes Treatment Readiness but Does not Affect Symptom Change in Patients With Personality Disorders: Findings From a Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Assessment, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic Assessment Promotes Treatment Readiness but Does not Affect Symptom Change in Patients With Personality Disorders: Findings From a Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
Psychological Assessment, June 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0035667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hilde De Saeger, Jan H. Kamphuis, Stephen E. Finn, Justin D. Smith, Roel Verheul, Jan J. van Busschbach, Dine J. Feenstra, Eva K. Horn

Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 26(2) of Psychological Assessment (see record 2014-10320-001). A study from Ackerman, Hilsenroth, Baity, & Blagys (2000), Hilsenroth, Ackerman, Clemence, & Strassle (2002), and Hilsenroth, Peters, & Ackerman (2004) was misrepresented in the original text. The text stated that the therapists and the assessors in this study were not the same person. The evaluation of this study should appear as follows: "It is noteworthy that the therapists and assessors were the same person, indicating that the techniques practiced by TA providers foster a therapeutic alliance that is sustained in subsequent psychotherapy and might aid in treatment readiness and success."] The field of clinical personality assessment is lacking in published empirical evidence regarding its treatment and clinical utility. This article reports on a randomized controlled clinical trial (N = 74) allocating patients awaiting treatment in a specialized clinic for personality disorders to either 4 sessions of (a) therapeutic assessment (TA) or (b) a structured goal-focused pretreatment intervention (GFPTI). In terms of short-term outcome, TA demonstrated superior ability to raise outcome expectancies and patient perceptions of progress toward treatment (Cohen's d = 0.65 and 0.56, respectively) and yielded higher satisfaction (d = 0.68). Moreover, patients reported marginally stronger alliance to the TA clinicians than to GFPT clinicians (d = 0.46), even though therapists perceived the alliance as equally positive in both groups. No differences in symptomatic ratings were observed. Results are discussed with reference to treatment utility in this particular patient group. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 60 58%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Assessment
#729
of 1,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,558
of 240,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Assessment
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.