↓ Skip to main content

Candida and Other Fungal Species

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Candida and Other Fungal Species
Published in
Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1177/0022034514521814
Pubmed ID
Authors

B.P. Krom, S. Kidwai, J.M. ten Cate

Abstract

In the last half-decade or so, interest in the bacterial part of the human microbiome and its role in maintaining health have received considerable attention. Since 2009, over 300 publications have appeared describing the oral bacterial microbiome. Strikingly, fungi in the oral cavity have been studied exclusively in relation to pathologies. However, little to nothing is known about a role of fungi in establishing and maintaining a healthy oral ecology. In a healthy ecology, balance is maintained by the combined positive and negative influences between and among its members. Interactions between fungi and bacteria occur primarily at a physical and chemical level. Physical interactions are represented by (co-)adhesion and repulsion (exclusion), while chemical interactions include metabolic dependencies, quorum-sensing, and the production of antimicrobial agents. Information obtained from oral model systems and also from studies on the role of fungi in gastro-intestinal ecology indicates that fungi influence bacterial behavior through these different interactions. This review describes our current knowledge of the interactions between fungi and bacteria and aims to illustrate that further research is required to establish the role of fungi in maintaining a healthy oral cavity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 156 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 22%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 35 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#14,390,979
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
#2,736
of 3,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,990
of 322,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.