↓ Skip to main content

On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: General and Special Theories of an Act of Control

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Review, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
727 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Ability to Inhibit Thought and Action: General and Special Theories of an Act of Control
Published in
Psychological Review, January 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0035230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon D. Logan, Trisha Van Zandt, Frederick Verbruggen, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Abstract

Response inhibition is an important act of control in many domains of psychology and neuroscience. It is often studied in a stop-signal task that requires subjects to inhibit an ongoing action in response to a stop signal. Performance in the stop-signal task is understood as a race between a go process that underlies the action and a stop process that inhibits the action. Responses are inhibited if the stop process finishes before the go process. The finishing time of the stop process is not directly observable; a mathematical model is required to estimate its duration. Logan and Cowan (1984) developed an independent race model that is widely used for this purpose. We present a general race model that extends the independent race model to account for the role of choice in go and stop processes, and a special race model that assumes each runner is a stochastic accumulator governed by a diffusion process. We apply the models to 2 data sets to test assumptions about selective influence of capacity limitations on drift rates and strategies on thresholds, which are largely confirmed. The model provides estimates of distributions of stop-signal response times, which previous models could not estimate. We discuss implications of viewing cognitive control as the result of a repertoire of acts of control tailored to different tasks and situations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 470 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 26%
Student > Master 65 13%
Student > Bachelor 64 13%
Researcher 61 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 64 13%
Unknown 84 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 209 43%
Neuroscience 75 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 4%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 42 9%
Unknown 111 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Review
#1,261
of 1,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,341
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Review
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.