You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Families of Dothideomycetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4 |
| Authors |
Kevin D. Hyde, E. B. Gareth Jones, Jian-Kui Liu, Hiran Ariyawansa, Eric Boehm, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Uwe Braun, Putarak Chomnunti, Pedro W. Crous, Dong-Qin Dai, Paul Diederich, Asha Dissanayake, Mingkhuan Doilom, Francesco Doveri, Singang Hongsanan, Ruvishika Jayawardena, James D. Lawrey, Yan-Mei Li, Yong-Xiang Liu, Robert Lücking, Jutamart Monkai, Lucia Muggia, Matthew P. Nelsen, Ka-Lai Pang, Rungtiwa Phookamsak, Indunil C. Senanayake, Carol A. Shearer, Satinee Suetrong, Kazuaki Tanaka, Kasun M. Thambugala, Nalin N. Wijayawardene, Saowanee Wikee, Hai-Xia Wu, Ying Zhang, Begoña Aguirre-Hudson, S. Aisyah Alias, André Aptroot, Ali H. Bahkali, Jose L. Bezerra, D. Jayarama Bhat, Erio Camporesi, Ekachai Chukeatirote, Cécile Gueidan, David L. Hawksworth, Kazuyuki Hirayama, Sybren De Hoog, Ji-Chuan Kang, Kerry Knudsen, Wen-Jing Li, Xing-Hong Li, Zou-Yi Liu, Ausana Mapook, Eric H. C. McKenzie, Andrew N. Miller, Peter E. Mortimer, Alan J. L. Phillips, Huzefa A. Raja, Christian Scheuer, Felix Schumm, Joanne E. Taylor, Qing Tian, Saowaluck Tibpromma, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Yong Wang, Jian-Chu Xu, Supalak Yacharoen, Ji-Ye Yan, Min Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 46% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,599,719
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#58
of 276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,380
of 308,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them