You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
STARE-HI – Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Clinical Informatics, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.4338/aci-2013-04-ra-0024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J Brender, J Talmon, N de Keizer, P Nykänen, M Rigby, E Ammenwerth |
| Abstract |
Improving the quality of reporting of evaluation studies in health informatics is an important requirement towards the vision of evidence-based health informatics. The STARE-HI - Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in health informatics, published in 2009, provides guidelines on the elements to be contained in an evaluation study report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 38 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#7,433,577
of 24,272,486 outputs
Outputs from Applied Clinical Informatics
#309
of 969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,108
of 448,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Clinical Informatics
#101
of 351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,272,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.