↓ Skip to main content

HUMeral Shaft Fractures: MEasuring Recovery after Operative versus Non-operative Treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HUMeral Shaft Fractures: MEasuring Recovery after Operative versus Non-operative Treatment (HUMMER): a multicenter comparative observational study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kiran C Mahabier, Esther MM Van Lieshout, Hugo W Bolhuis, P Koen Bos, Maarten WGA Bronkhorst, Milko MM Bruijninckx, Jeroen De Haan, Axel R Deenik, Boudewijn J Dwars, Martin G Eversdijk, J Carel Goslings, Robert Haverlag, Martin J Heetveld, Albert JH Kerver, Karel A Kolkman, Peter A Leenhouts, Sven AG Meylaerts, Ron Onstenk, Martijn Poeze, Rudolf W Poolman, Bas J Punt, W Herbert Roerdink, Gert R Roukema, Jan Bernard Sintenie, Nicolaj MR Soesman, Andras KF Tanka, Edgar JT Ten Holder, Maarten Van der Elst, Frank HWM Van der Heijden, Frits M Van der Linden, Peer Van der Zwaal, Jan P Van Dijk, Hans-Peter W Van Jonbergen, Egbert JMM Verleisdonk, Jos PAM Vroemen, Marco Waleboer, Philippe Wittich, Wietse P Zuidema, Suzanne Polinder, Michael HJ Verhofstad, Dennis Den Hartog

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 15%
Other 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 43 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,434
of 4,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,897
of 334,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#54
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.