↓ Skip to main content

Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
533 Mendeley
Title
Food security in a perfect storm: using the ecosystem services framework to increase understanding
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, April 2014
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2012.0288
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. M. Poppy, S. Chiotha, F. Eigenbrod, C. A. Harvey, M. Honzák, M. D. Hudson, A. Jarvis, N. J. Madise, K. Schreckenberg, C. M. Shackleton, F. Villa, T. P. Dawson

Abstract

Achieving food security in a 'perfect storm' scenario is a grand challenge for society. Climate change and an expanding global population act in concert to make global food security even more complex and demanding. As achieving food security and the millennium development goal (MDG) to eradicate hunger influences the attainment of other MDGs, it is imperative that we offer solutions which are complementary and do not oppose one another. Sustainable intensification of agriculture has been proposed as a way to address hunger while also minimizing further environmental impact. However, the desire to raise productivity and yields has historically led to a degraded environment, reduced biodiversity and a reduction in ecosystem services (ES), with the greatest impacts affecting the poor. This paper proposes that the ES framework coupled with a policy response framework, for example Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR), can allow food security to be delivered alongside healthy ecosystems, which provide many other valuable services to humankind. Too often, agro-ecosystems have been considered as separate from other natural ecosystems and insufficient attention has been paid to the way in which services can flow to and from the agro-ecosystem to surrounding ecosystems. Highlighting recent research in a large multi-disciplinary project (ASSETS), we illustrate the ES approach to food security using a case study from the Zomba district of Malawi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Costa Rica 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 504 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 118 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 96 18%
Student > Master 69 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 8%
Other 24 5%
Other 99 19%
Unknown 87 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 26%
Environmental Science 134 25%
Social Sciences 56 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 3%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 121 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,104,412
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#967
of 7,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,526
of 240,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.