You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Feasibility of using administrative data to compare hospital performance in the EU
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/intqhc/mzu015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. Groene, S. Kristensen, O.A. Arah, C.A. Thompson, P. Bartels, R. Sunol, N. Klazinga, on behalf of the DUQuE Project Consortium, N Klazinga, DS Kringos, MJMH Lombarts, T Plochg, MA Lopez, M Secanell, R Sunol, P Vallejo, P Bartels, S Kristensen, P Michel, F Saillour-Glenisson, F Vlcek, M Car, S Jones, E Klaus, S Bottaro, P Garel, M Saluvan, C Bruneau, A Depaigne-Loth, C Shaw, A Hammer, O Ommen, H Pfaff, O Groene, D Botje, C Wagner, H Kutaj-Wasikowska, B Kutryba, A Escoval, A Lívio, M Eiras, M Franca, I Leite, F Almeman, H Kus, K Ozturk, R Mannion, OA Arah, M DerSarkissian, CA Thompson, A Wang, A Thompson |
| Abstract |
To describe hospitals' organizational arrangements relevant to the abstraction of administrative data, to report on the completeness of administrative data collected and to assess associations between organizational arrangements and completeness of data submission. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bermuda | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,937,459
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#706
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,486
of 223,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.