You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Computers in Human Behavior, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.025 |
Authors |
Sanne Kruikemeier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 21% |
Canada | 2 | 14% |
Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Chile | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 57% |
Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 373 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Finland | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 2% |
Unknown | 350 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 73 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 13% |
Researcher | 31 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 5% |
Other | 64 | 17% |
Unknown | 72 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 157 | 42% |
Computer Science | 48 | 13% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 22 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 19 | 5% |
Engineering | 13 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 9% |
Unknown | 80 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#926,162
of 25,546,214 outputs
Outputs from Computers in Human Behavior
#432
of 4,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,767
of 242,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computers in Human Behavior
#16
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,546,214 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.