↓ Skip to main content

The Relative Ineffectiveness of Criminal Network Disruption

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
37 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
198 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Relative Ineffectiveness of Criminal Network Disruption
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep04238
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A. C. Duijn, Victor Kashirin, Peter M. A. Sloot

Abstract

Researchers, policymakers and law enforcement agencies across the globe struggle to find effective strategies to control criminal networks. The effectiveness of disruption strategies is known to depend on both network topology and network resilience. However, as these criminal networks operate in secrecy, data-driven knowledge concerning the effectiveness of different criminal network disruption strategies is very limited. By combining computational modeling and social network analysis with unique criminal network intelligence data from the Dutch Police, we discovered, in contrast to common belief, that criminal networks might even become 'stronger', after targeted attacks. On the other hand increased efficiency within criminal networks decreases its internal security, thus offering opportunities for law enforcement agencies to target these networks more deliberately. Our results emphasize the importance of criminal network interventions at an early stage, before the network gets a chance to (re-)organize to maximum resilience. In the end disruption strategies force criminal networks to become more exposed, which causes successful network disruption to become a long-term effort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 255 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 21%
Student > Master 37 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 52 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 68 26%
Computer Science 26 10%
Psychology 17 6%
Physics and Astronomy 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 63 24%
Unknown 66 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,096,229
of 24,843,842 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#11,108
of 135,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,734
of 227,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#68
of 809 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,843,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 809 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.