↓ Skip to main content

PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY VERSUS COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY FOR SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER: AN EFFICACY AND PARTIAL EFFECTIVENESS TRIAL

Overview of attention for article published in Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY VERSUS COGNITIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY FOR SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER: AN EFFICACY AND PARTIAL EFFECTIVENESS TRIAL
Published in
Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269), February 2014
DOI 10.1002/da.22246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan M. Bögels, Paul Wijts, Frans J. Oort, Steph J. M. Sallaerts

Abstract

Comparing the overall and differential effects of psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) versus cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Unknown 374 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 18%
Student > Bachelor 56 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 12%
Researcher 31 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 99 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 186 49%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 9%
Social Sciences 15 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 1%
Other 22 6%
Unknown 110 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,862,369
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#283
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,457
of 235,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Depression & Anxiety (1091-4269)
#8
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.