↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition in ASD: meta‐analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Autism Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibition in ASD: meta‐analyses
Published in
Autism Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/aur.1369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hilde M. Geurts, Sanne F. W. M. van den Bergh, Laura Ruzzano

Abstract

There is a substantial amount of data providing evidence for, but also against the hypothesis that individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) encounter inhibitory control deficits. ASD is often associated with interference control deficits rather than prepotent response inhibition. Moreover, the developmental trajectory for these inhibitory control processes is hypothesized to differ in ASD as compared to typical development. In efforts to gain a more comprehensive perspective of inhibition in ASD, separate quantitative analysis for prepotent response inhibition studies and interference control studies were conducted. Together, these two meta-analyses included 41 studies with a combined sample size of 1,091 people with ASD (M age 14.8 years), and 1,306 typically developing (TD) controls (M age 13.8 years).The meta-analyses indicated that individuals with ASD show increased difficulties in prepotent response inhibition (effect size 0.55) and in interference control (effect size 0.31). In addition, age was a relevant moderator for prepotent response inhibition but not for interference control. Exploratory analyses revealed that when IQ was taken into account, heterogeneity considerably decreased among interference control studies but not among prepotent response inhibition. In contrast to the general belief, both prepotent response inhibition and interference control problems were observed in individuals with ASD. However, a large variation between studies was also found. Therefore, there remain factors beyond inhibition type, age, or IQ that significantly influence inhibitory control performance among individuals with ASD. Autism Res 2014, ●●: ●●-●●. © 2014 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 19%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 60 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 93 37%
Neuroscience 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 21 8%
Unknown 77 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,029,081
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Autism Research
#1,579
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,482
of 226,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autism Research
#16
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.