↓ Skip to main content

Lysophospholipid Receptors, as Novel Conditional Danger Receptors and Homeostatic Receptors Modulate Inflammation—Novel Paradigm and Therapeutic Potential

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lysophospholipid Receptors, as Novel Conditional Danger Receptors and Homeostatic Receptors Modulate Inflammation—Novel Paradigm and Therapeutic Potential
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12265-016-9700-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Wang, Ya-Feng Li, Gayani Nanayakkara, Ying Shao, Bin Liang, Lauren Cole, William Y. Yang, Xinyuan Li, Ramon Cueto, Jun Yu, Hong Wang, Xiao-Feng Yang

Abstract

There are limitations in the current classification of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) receptors. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new paradigm by using endogenous metabolites lysophospholipids (LPLs) as a prototype. By utilizing a data mining method we pioneered, we made the following findings: (1) endogenous metabolites such as LPLs at basal level have physiological functions; (2) under sterile inflammation, expression of some LPLs is elevated. These LPLs act as conditional DAMPs or anti-inflammatory homeostasis-associated molecular pattern molecules (HAMPs) for regulating the progression of inflammation or inhibition of inflammation, respectively; (3) receptors for conditional DAMPs and HAMPs are differentially expressed in human and mouse tissues; and (4) complex signaling mechanism exists between pro-inflammatory mediators and classical DAMPs that regulate the expression of conditional DAMPs and HAMPs. This novel insight will facilitate identification of novel conditional DAMPs and HAMPs, thus promote development of new therapeutic targets to treat inflammatory disorders.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 15%
Computer Science 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2016.
All research outputs
#5,942,633
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#152
of 580 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,475
of 337,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 580 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.