A critical and benchmark comparison on graphene-, carbon nanotube-, and fullerene-semiconductor nanocomposites as visible light photocatalysts for selective oxidation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Catalysis, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 25% of all articles scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring articles from this source (#9 of 386)
  • High score compared to articles of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good score compared to articles of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Article title
A critical and benchmark comparison on graphene-, carbon nanotube-, and fullerene-semiconductor nanocomposites as visible light photocatalysts for selective oxidation
Published in
Journal of Catalysis, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.11.021

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this article. Click here to see the article's page on the Mendeley website.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Ph.D. Student 2 40%
Researcher (at a non-Academic Institution) 1 20%
Post Doc 1 20%
Professor 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 40%
Physics 2 40%
Materials Science 1 20%

Score in context

This article has an Altmetric score of 7.00. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that this article has received. This score was calculated when the article was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All articles
#443,358
of 3,628,302 articles
Articles in Journal of Catalysis
#9
of 386 articles
Articles of similar age
#13,835
of 94,142 articles
Articles of similar age in Journal of Catalysis
#1
of 8 articles
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,302 articles across all sources so far. Compared to these this article has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all articles ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 articles from this source. They typically receive a little less attention than average, with a mean score of 1.1. This article has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older articles will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 94,142 tracked articles that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This article has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this article to 8 articles from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This article has scored higher than all of them