A critical and benchmark comparison on graphene-, carbon nanotube-, and fullerene-semiconductor nanocomposites as visible light photocatalysts for selective oxidation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Catalysis, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 386)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
A critical and benchmark comparison on graphene-, carbon nanotube-, and fullerene-semiconductor nanocomposites as visible light photocatalysts for selective oxidation
Published in
Journal of Catalysis, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jcat.2012.11.021

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
China 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 46%
Engineering 4 17%
Physics 3 13%
Materials Science 3 13%
Astronomy / Astrophysics / Space Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#443,358
of 3,628,302 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Catalysis
#9
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,835
of 94,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Catalysis
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean score of 1.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 94,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them