Novel visible-light-driven AgX/graphite-like C3N4 (X=Br, I) hybrid materials with synergistic photocatalytic activity

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 426)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Novel visible-light-driven AgX/graphite-like C3N4 (X=Br, I) hybrid materials with synergistic photocatalytic activity
Published in
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.015

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 6%
Saudi Arabia 1 6%
Czech Republic 1 6%
Unknown 13 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 13%
Unknown 14 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 63%
Materials Science 4 25%
Environmental Sciences 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#438,041
of 3,635,018 outputs
Outputs from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#6
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,825
of 94,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,635,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 94,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.