ā†“ Skip to main content

The validation of a social functioning questionnaire in an African postconflict context

Overview of attention for article published in Transcultural Psychiatry, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The validation of a social functioning questionnaire in an African postconflict context
Published in
Transcultural Psychiatry, October 2013
DOI 10.1177/1363461513504812
Pubmed ID
Authors

Femke Verduin, Willem F. Scholte, Theoneste Rutayisire, Wim B. Busschers, Karien Stronks

Abstract

This study evaluated the reliability and criterion validity of the Byumba Social Functioning Questionnaire (BSFQ), an instrument to measure social functioning in Rwanda. The instrument was locally composed in concordance with a well-described method for culture-specific and sex-specific function assessment. Respondents in a Northern Province of Rwanda (Nā€‰=ā€‰393) were assessed with the BSFQ and a 19-item scale (SF-19) drawn from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36). The BSFQ's internal consistency was just acceptable for women but poor for men, while the SF-19 had good to excellent internal consisteny. BSFQ total scores showed a strong floor effect, while the SF-19 showed more variation in total score distribution. The BSFQ did not perform as well as we expected, and appears not to be suitable for measuring social functioning in the study context. This outcome seems to reflect the conceptualization of social functioning used in constructing the BSFQ. Implications for the development of culture-specific measures of functional status are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 33%
Other 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Psychology 4 19%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 24%