You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cannabis potency, titration and dependence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Addiction, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/add.12508 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peggy van der Pol, Nienke Liebregts, Tibor Brunt, Jan van Amsterdam, Ron de Graaf, Dirk J. Korf, Wim van den Brink, Margriet van Laar |
| Abstract |
Increased delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations in cannabis may lead to higher THC exposure, cannabis dependence and treatment need, but users may also adapt the actual intake of THC through reduced inhalation of THC containing smoke (titration). We investigated whether consumers of stronger cannabis use less cannabis per joint or inhale less smoke than those using less potent cannabis and whether these factors predict cannabis dependence severity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 24% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 31 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 104. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#393,723
of 24,996,701 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#300
of 5,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,627
of 249,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#3
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,996,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.