↓ Skip to main content

Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously

Overview of attention for article published in Social Indicators Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Political Trust and Sophistication: Taking Measurement Seriously
Published in
Social Indicators Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-1182-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sedef Turper, Kees Aarts

Abstract

Political trust is an important indicator of political legitimacy. Hence, seemingly decreasing levels of political trust in Western democracies have stimulated a growing body of research on the causes and consequences of political trust. However, the neglect of potential measurement problems of political trust raises doubts about the findings of earlier studies. The current study revisits the measurement of political trust and re-examines the relationship between political trust and sophistication in the Netherlands by utilizing European Social Survey (ESS) data across five time points and four-wave panel data from the Panel Component of ESS. Our findings illustrate that high and low political sophistication groups display different levels of political trust even when measurement characteristics of political trust are taken into consideration. However, the relationship between political sophistication and political trust is weaker than it is often suggested by earlier research. Our findings also provide partial support for the argument that the gap between sophistication groups is widening over time. Furthermore, we demonstrate that, although the between-method differences between the latent means and the composite score means of political trust for high- and low sophistication groups are relatively minor, it is important to analyze the measurement characteristics of the political trust construct.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 144 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 15 10%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 27 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 81 55%
Psychology 15 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,017,599
of 25,349,102 outputs
Outputs from Social Indicators Research
#657
of 1,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,104
of 399,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Indicators Research
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,349,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.