↓ Skip to main content

Fate of Duct-Dependent, Discontinuous Pulmonary Arteries After Arterial Duct Stenting

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Cardiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fate of Duct-Dependent, Discontinuous Pulmonary Arteries After Arterial Duct Stenting
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00246-017-1672-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe Santoro, Giovanbattista Capozzi, Mario Giordano, Gianpiero Gaio, Maria Teresa Palladino, Carola Iacono, Heba Talat Mahmoud, Maria Giovanna Russo

Abstract

Significant and balanced PA growth following arterial duct (AD) stenting has already been consistently reported in literature. However, to date, no data are available about the role of this approach as palliation of congenital heart disease with a duct-dependent discontinuous pulmonary artery (dPA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the fate of a dPA of ductal origin following trans-catheter AD stabilization. Angiographic PA evaluation was performed in seven patients submitted to neonatal AD stenting as palliative recruitment of dPA. Five patients showed discontinuity of one PA, while two patients had both PAs served by bilateral ducts. PA growth was evaluated as per the Nakata index, McGoon ratio as well as dPA (n = 9) versus heart-dependent PA (hPA; n = 5) size and z-score changes. AD stabilization was performed using coronary stents dilated to 3.2 ± 0.3 mm (median 3.4), with significant increase of O2 saturation (from 83 ± 11 to 95 ± 5%, p < 0.02). Control angiography was performed 5.1 ± 2.8 months (median 6 months) after duct stenting, showing significant growth of the dPA (from 3.7 ± 1.0 to 7.6 ± 2.7 mm, p < 0.001; z-score from -0.7 ± 1.4 to 1.7 ± 2.2, p < 0.01). A trend toward better growth of the dPA as compared with the hPA was found (117 ± 87 vs. 54 ± 34%, p = NS). The final vessel size was still significantly different between the groups (dPA 7.6 ± 2.7 vs. hPA 11.9 ± 3.4 mm, p = 0.02), although the final z-score value did not significantly differ (dPA 1.7 ± 2.2 vs. hPA 3.8 ± 0.9 mm, p = NS). In conclusion, percutaneous AD stenting is effective in promoting a significant catch-up growth of duct-dependent dPA, being, therefore, advisable as a reliable alternative to surgical palliation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Unspecified 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,434,884
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Cardiology
#1,102
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,116
of 312,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Cardiology
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.