↓ Skip to main content

Palliative noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Palliative noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00134-011-2263-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Élie Azoulay, Alexandre Demoule, Samir Jaber, Achille Kouatchet, Anne-Pascale Meert, Laurent Papazian, Laurent Brochard

Abstract

Over the last two decades, the increasing use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has diminished the need for endotracheal ventilation, thus decreasing the rate of ventilation-induced complications. Thus, NIV has decreased both intubation rates and mortality rates in specific subsets of patients with acute respiratory failure (e.g., patients with hypercapnia, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, immune deficiencies, or post-transplantation acute respiratory failure). NIV is also increasingly used as a palliative strategy when endotracheal ventilation is deemed inappropriate. In this context, palliative NIV can either be administered to offer a chance for survival, or to alleviate the symptoms of respiratory distress in dying patients. The literature provides information from 10 studies published between 1992 and 2006, in which 458 patients received palliative NIV. The technique was feasible, usually well tolerated, and half of the patients survived. The objectives of this review article are to define palliative NIV, to delineate the place for palliative NIV among overall indications of NIV, and to define the contribution of NIV to the palliative strategies available for patients with acute respiratory failure. Potential benefits and harm from NIV in patients who are not eligible for endotracheal ventilation are discussed. The appropriateness of palliative NIV should be reported in a study that relies on both quantitative criteria (rate of palliative NIV use and mortality) and qualitative criteria (patient comfort, end-of-life process, family burden, and health-care provider satisfaction).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 131 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 23 17%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 15 11%
Other 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Psychology 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#6,350,582
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,641
of 5,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,591
of 113,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.