↓ Skip to main content

Celiac disease and risk of fracture in adults—a review

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Celiac disease and risk of fracture in adults—a review
Published in
Osteoporosis International, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00198-014-2683-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. M. Hjelle, E. Apalset, P. Mielnik, J. Bollerslev, K. E. A. Lundin, G. S. Tell

Abstract

Patients with celiac disease (CD) have low bone mineral density. Evidence of increased fracture risk in these patients is conflicting, and the indication for bone mineral density screening of all adult CD patients is debated. Our aim was to review current published data on fractures in CD. Cross-sectional cohort studies and one case study were identified by searching Medline and Embase. Although the identified studies are heterogeneous and difficult to compare, the overall findings indicate a positive association between CD and risk of fracture. Adult patients with CD should be considered for bone densitometry in order to estimate fracture risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 11 29%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Engineering 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2015.
All research outputs
#1,943,258
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#302
of 3,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,370
of 227,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#4
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.