↓ Skip to main content

Gay-related Development, Early Abuse and Adult Health Outcomes Among Gay Males

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gay-related Development, Early Abuse and Adult Health Outcomes Among Gay Males
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, November 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10461-007-9319-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark S. Friedman, Michael P. Marshal, Ron Stall, JeeWon Cheong, Eric R. Wright

Abstract

This study examined relationships between timing of gay-related developmental milestones, early abuse, and emergence of poor health outcomes in adulthood among 1,383 gay/bisexual men in the Urban Men's Health Study. Latent Profile Analysis grouped participants as developing early, middle or late based on the achievement of four phenomena including age of first awareness of same-sex sexual attractions and disclosure of sexual orientation. Participants who developed early were more likely, compared to others, to experience forced sex and gay-related harassment before adulthood. They were more likely to be HIV seropositive and experience gay-related victimization, partner abuse and depression during adulthood. Early forced-sex, gay-related harassment and physical abuse were associated with several negative health outcomes in adulthood including HIV infection, partner abuse, and depression. This analysis suggests that the experience of homophobic attacks against young gay/bisexual male youth helps to explain heightened rates of serious health problems among adult gay men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 8%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 132 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 31 21%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 26%
Psychology 32 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 36 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,360,962
of 25,347,437 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#811
of 3,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,949
of 86,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,347,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.