You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of serrated polyps and association with synchronous advanced neoplasia in screening colonoscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Endoscopy, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1055/s-0033-1358800 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yark Hazewinkel, Thomas R de Wijkerslooth, Esther M Stoop, Patrick M Bossuyt, Katharina Biermann, Marc J van de Vijver, Paul Fockens, Monique E van Leerdam, Ernst J Kuipers, Evelien Dekker |
| Abstract |
Serrated polyps of the large intestine comprise a heterogeneous group of lesions with distinct histological and malignant features. The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of serrated polyp subtypes in a cohort of individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy, and to identify associations between the detection of serrated polyp subtypes and advanced neoplasia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,491
of 22,753,345 outputs
Outputs from Endoscopy
#1,600
of 2,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,040
of 302,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endoscopy
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,753,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.