↓ Skip to main content

Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance…

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment
Published in
Heart, April 2014
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim P van de Hoef, Froukje Nolte, Mauro EchavarrÍa-Pinto, Martijn A van Lavieren, Peter Damman, Steven A J Chamuleau, Michiel Voskuil, Hein J Verberne, José P S Henriques, Berthe L F van Eck-Smit, Karel T Koch, Robbert J de Winter, Jos A E Spaan, Maria Siebes, Jan G P Tijssen, Martijn Meuwissen, Jan J Piek

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) aims to identify the extent of epicardial disease, but may be obscured by involvement of the coronary microvasculature. We documented the impact of hyperaemic stenosis resistance (HSR) and hyperaemic microvascular resistance (HMR) on FFR, and its relationship with myocardial ischaemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 14 17%
Other 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 17 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 57%
Engineering 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#14,556,454
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#4,341
of 5,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,069
of 228,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#47
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.