↓ Skip to main content

Two-incision technique for implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Overview of attention for article published in Heart Rhythm, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two-incision technique for implantation of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Published in
Heart Rhythm, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.05.016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reinoud E. Knops, Louise R.A. Olde Nordkamp, Joris R. de Groot, Arthur A.M. Wilde

Abstract

Three incisions in the chest are necessary for implantation of the entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD). The superior parasternal incision is a possible risk for infection and a potential source of discomfort. A less invasive alternative technique of implanting the S-ICD electrode--the two-incision technique--avoids the superior parasternal incision.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 15%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 21 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,047,742
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Heart Rhythm
#1,835
of 4,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,736
of 208,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart Rhythm
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.