You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Respiration phase‐locks to fast stimulus presentations: Implications for the interpretation of posterior midline “deactivations”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Brain Mapping, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/hbm.22523 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Willem Huijbers, Cyriel M.A. Pennartz, Ewa Beldzik, Aleksandra Domagalik, M. Vinck, Winnie F. Hofman, Roberto Cabeza, Sander M. Daselaar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 24% |
| Researcher | 23 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2016.
All research outputs
#999,892
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Human Brain Mapping
#188
of 4,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,939
of 228,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Brain Mapping
#3
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.