You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The art of being healthy: a qualitative study to develop a thematic framework for understanding the relationship between health and the arts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina R Davies, Matthew Knuiman, Peter Wright, Michael Rosenberg |
| Abstract |
In recent years the health-arts nexus has received increasing attention; however, the relationship is not well understood and the extent of possible positive, negative and unintended outcomes is unknown. Guided by the biopsychosocial model of health and theories of social epidemiology, the aim of this study was to develop a framework pertaining to the relationship between arts engagement and population health that included outcomes, confounders and effect modifiers. A health-arts framework is of value to researchers seeking to build the evidence base; health professionals interested in understanding the health-arts relationship, especially those who use social prescribing for health promotion or to complement treatments; in teaching medical, nursing and health-science students about arts outcomes, as well as artists and health professionals in the development of policy and programmes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 322 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 69 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 52 | 16% |
| United States | 30 | 9% |
| Canada | 11 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 9% |
| Unknown | 117 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 240 | 75% |
| Scientists | 38 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 18% |
| Researcher | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 14% |
| Psychology | 24 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#138,166
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#261
of 25,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,051
of 242,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#6
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.