↓ Skip to main content

Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Quality in Health Care, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management functions in EU hospitals: implementation and impact on patient-centred care strategies
Published in
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, March 2014
DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzu022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oliver Groene, Rosa Sunol, Niek S. Klazinga, Aolin Wang, Maral Dersarkissian, Caroline A. Thompson, Andrew Thompson, Onyebuchi A. Arah, on behalf of the DUQuE Project Consortium, N Klazinga, DS Kringos, MJMH Lombarts, T Plochg, MA Lopez, M Secanell, R Sunol, P Vallejo, P Bartels, S Kristensen, P Michel, F Saillour-Glenisson, F Vlcek, M Car, S Jones, E Klaus, S Bottaro, P Garel, M Saluvan, C Bruneau, A Depaigne-Loth, C Shaw, A Hammer, O Ommen, H Pfaff, O Groene, D Botje, C Wagner, H Kutaj-Wasikowska, B Kutryba, A Escoval, A Lívio, M Eiras, M Franca, I Leite, F Almeman, H Kus, K Ozturk, R Mannion, OA Arah, M DerSarkissian, CA Thompson, A Wang, A Thompson

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the involvement of patients or their representatives in quality management (QM) functions and to assess associations between levels of involvement and the implementation of patient-centred care strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 6 4%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 127 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 31 22%
Unknown 35 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 19%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,481,272
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#210
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,610
of 222,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.