You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How well tolerated is supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Opinion in Urology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1097/mou.0000000000000023 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joyce Baard, Guido M. Kamphuis, Matias Westendarp, Jean J.M.C.H. de la Rosette |
Abstract |
Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been described in 1988 and several modifications followed since. Despite claimed benefits, supine PCNL is still neglected by the majority of urologists. Lack of experience and the fear of complications are possible explanations for the resistance to supine positioning. This review evaluates recent literature on the use of supine PCNL, focussing on benefits and safety. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 40% |
Psychology | 2 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2014.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Urology
#650
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,498
of 236,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Urology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.