↓ Skip to main content

Maternal Depression and Child Psychopathology: A Meta-Analytic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 414)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
policy
7 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
1509 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal Depression and Child Psychopathology: A Meta-Analytic Review
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10567-010-0080-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sherryl H. Goodman, Matthew H. Rouse, Arin M. Connell, Michelle Robbins Broth, Christine M. Hall, Devin Heyward

Abstract

Although the association between maternal depression and adverse child outcomes is well established, the strength of the association, the breadth or specificity of the outcomes, and the role of moderators are not known. This information is essential to inform not only models of risk but also the design of preventive interventions by helping to identify subgroups at greater risk than others and to elucidate potential mechanisms as targets of interventions. A meta-analysis of 193 studies was conducted to examine the strength of the association between mothers' depression and children's behavioral problems or emotional functioning. Maternal depression was significantly related to higher levels of internalizing, externalizing, and general psychopathology and negative affect/behavior and to lower levels of positive affect/behavior, with all associations small in magnitude. These associations were significantly moderated by theoretically and methodologically relevant variables, with patterns of moderation found to vary somewhat with each child outcome. Results are interpreted in terms of implications for theoretical models that move beyond main effects models in order to more accurately identify which children of depressed mothers are more or less at risk for specific outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 1489 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 292 19%
Student > Master 214 14%
Researcher 171 11%
Student > Bachelor 159 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 128 8%
Other 213 14%
Unknown 332 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 668 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 135 9%
Social Sciences 103 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 3%
Neuroscience 37 2%
Other 118 8%
Unknown 402 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#246,335
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#9
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#761
of 124,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them