You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A checklist for patient safety rounds at the care pathway level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/intqhc/mzu019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cordula Wagner, Caroline A. Thompson, Onyebuchi A. Arah, Oliver Groene, Niek S. Klazinga, Maral Dersarkissian, Rosa Suñol, on behalf of the DUQuE Project Consortium, N Klazinga, DS Kringos, MJMH Lombarts, T Plochg, MA Lopez, M Secanell, R Sunol, P Vallejo, P Bartels, S Kristensen, P Michel, F Saillour-Glenisson, F Vlcek, M Car, S Jones, E Klaus, S Bottaro, P Garel, M Saluvan, C Bruneau, A Depaigne-Loth, C Shaw, A Hammer, O Ommen, H Pfaff, O Groene, D Botje, C Wagner, H Kutaj-Wasikowska, B Kutryba, A Escoval, A Lívio, M Eiras, M Franca, I Leite, F Almeman, H Kus, K Ozturk, R Mannion, OA Arah, M DerSarkissian, CA Thompson, A Wang, A Thompson |
| Abstract |
To define a checklist that can be used to assess the performance of a department and evaluate the implementation of quality management (QM) activities across departments or pathways in acute care hospitals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 26% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,781,203
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#1,281
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,582
of 221,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#28
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.