From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China's international practice and its image, 1950–2009

Overview of attention for article published in Public Relations Review
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 25% of all articles scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring articles from this source (#22 of 213)
  • Good score compared to articles of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Article title
From propaganda to public diplomacy: Assessing China's international practice and its image, 1950–2009
Published in
Public Relations Review
DOI 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.04.008

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this article. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this article. Click here to see the article's page on the Mendeley website.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Assistant Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business Administration 1 100%

Score in context

This article has an Altmetric score of 4.80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that this article has received. This score was calculated when the article was last mentioned on 02 June 2014.
All articles
#674,358
of 3,833,961 articles
Articles in Public Relations Review
#22
of 213 articles
Articles of similar age
#19,106
of 95,323 articles
Articles of similar age in Public Relations Review
#2
of 3 articles
Altmetric has tracked 3,833,961 articles across all sources so far. Compared to these this article has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all articles ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 articles from this source. They typically receive a little less attention than average, with a mean score of 2.3. This article has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older articles will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 95,323 tracked articles that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This article has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this article to 3 articles from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.