Au deposited BiOCl with different facets: On determination of the facet-induced transfer preference of charge carriers and the different plasmonic activity

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • Good score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Au deposited BiOCl with different facets: On determination of the facet-induced transfer preference of charge carriers and the different plasmonic activity
Published in
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
DOI 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.05.018

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 17%
Librarian 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 67%
Materials Science 1 17%
Engineering 1 17%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,712,056
of 4,506,837 outputs
Outputs from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#90
of 562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,952
of 106,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,506,837 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 562 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 106,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them