Climbing into the past—first Himalayan mummies discovered in Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Science, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Climbing into the past—first Himalayan mummies discovered in Nepal
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Science, January 2003
DOI 10.1016/s0305-4403(03)00056-6

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Italy 2 5%
Germany 2 5%
Russian Federation 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
France 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 33 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Other 2 5%
Professor 1 2%
Unknown 30 70%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 28%
Humanities 10 23%
Earth Sciences 7 16%
Biological Sciences 5 12%
Chemistry 4 9%
Other 7 16%

Score in context

This research output has an Altmetric score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This score was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#108,418
of 3,846,716 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#59
of 1,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,939
of 95,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,846,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this score to the 95,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them