↓ Skip to main content

Effects of creatine supplementation on performance and training adaptations

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, February 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 2,455)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
32 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
63 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
527 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of creatine supplementation on performance and training adaptations
Published in
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, February 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1022465203458
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard B. Kreider

Abstract

Creatine has become a popular nutritional supplement among athletes. Recent research has also suggested that there may be a number of potential therapeutic uses of creatine. This paper reviews the available research that has examined the potential ergogenic value of creatine supplementation on exercise performance and training adaptations. Review of the literature indicates that over 500 research studies have evaluated the effects of creatine supplementation on muscle physiology and/or exercise capacity in healthy, trained, and various diseased populations. Short-term creatine supplementation (e.g. 20 g/day for 5-7 days) has typically been reported to increase total creatine content by 10-30% and phosphocreatine stores by 10-40%. Of the approximately 300 studies that have evaluated the potential ergogenic value of creatine supplementation, about 70% of these studies report statistically significant results while remaining studies generally report non-significant gains in performance. No study reports a statistically significant ergolytic effect. For example, short-term creatine supplementation has been reported to improve maximal power/strength (5-15%), work performed during sets of maximal effort muscle contractions (5-15%), single-effort sprint performance (1-5%), and work performed during repetitive sprint performance (5-15%). Moreover, creatine supplementation during training has been reported to promote significantly greater gains in strength, fat free mass, and performance primarily of high intensity exercise tasks. Although not all studies report significant results, the preponderance of scientific evidence indicates that creatine supplementation appears to be a generally effective nutritional ergogenic aid for a variety of exercise tasks in a number of athletic and clinical populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 527 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 513 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 139 26%
Student > Master 89 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 9%
Student > Postgraduate 28 5%
Other 21 4%
Other 62 12%
Unknown 141 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 154 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 3%
Other 50 9%
Unknown 158 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 236. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#162,145
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#3
of 2,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168
of 142,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.