↓ Skip to main content

Saliva: Secretion and Functions

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: The use of saliva markers in psychobiology: mechanisms and methods.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The use of saliva markers in psychobiology: mechanisms and methods.
Book title
Saliva: Secretion and Functions
Published in
Monographs in oral science, May 2014
DOI 10.1159/000358864
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-802595-8, 978-3-31-802596-5
Authors

Bosch JA, Jos A. Bosch

Abstract

In the social sciences, the use of saliva parameters has greatly expanded in recent years from the measurement of steroid hormones, like cortisol, and now includes a wide range of biochemical parameters. These salivary constituents can be broadly classified into two groups: (1) constituents that enter saliva from plasma (e.g. hormones, inflammatory markers, drug chemicals) and (2) constituents that are produced locally by the saliva glands (e.g. α-amylase, secretory IgA). Reliable measurement of blood-borne constituents assumes a constant saliva/plasma ratio (SPR), which implies that the concentration in saliva truthfully follows intra- and interindividual variations in plasma. The first part of this review discusses the main determinants of the SPR: the mechanism by which plasma constituents enter saliva (i.e. passive diffusion, active transport, ultrafiltration, leakage) and associated physiochemical factors. The second part of this review provides an overview of central and peripheral neural mechanisms that regulate saliva gland function and the release of glandular proteins. This section provides a neurobiological underpinning for a section, which addresses methodological implications for the assessment of glandular secretions. Salivary psychophysiology is a fast-growing field and the time seems ripe for more rigorous methodological studies that may help this discipline to reach its full potential. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Psychology 14 13%
Sports and Recreations 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#13,409,581
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Monographs in oral science
#25
of 54 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,475
of 226,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monographs in oral science
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.