↓ Skip to main content

Madurella mycetomatis Is Highly Susceptible to Ravuconazole

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Madurella mycetomatis Is Highly Susceptible to Ravuconazole
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002942
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Abdalla Ahmed, Wendy Kloezen, Frederick Duncanson, Ed E. Zijlstra, G. Sybren de Hoog, Ahmed H. Fahal, Wendy W. J. van de Sande

Abstract

The current treatment of eumycetoma utilizing ketoconazole is unsatisfactory because of high recurrence rates, which often leads to complications and unnecessary amputations, and its comparatively high cost in endemic areas. Hence, an effective and affordable drug is required to improve therapeutic outcome. E1224 is a potent orally available, broad-spectrum triazole currently being developed for the treatment of Chagas disease. E1224 is a prodrug that is rapidly converted to ravuconazole. Plasma levels of E1224 are low and transient, and its therapeutically active moiety, ravuconazole is therapeutically active. In the present study, the in vitro activity of ravuconazole against Madurella mycetomatis, the most common etiologic agent of eumycetoma, was evaluated and compared to that of ketoconazole and itraconazole. Ravuconazole showed excellent activity with MICs ranging between ≤0.002 and 0.031 µg/ml, which were significantly lower than the MICs reported for ketoconazole and itraconazole. On the basis of our findings, E1224 with its resultant active moiety, ravuconazole, could be an effective and affordable therapeutic option for the treatment of eumycetoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 8 25%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Chemistry 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,687,422
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,983
of 9,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,004
of 242,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#48
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.