↓ Skip to main content

Decline of ‘biodiversity’ in conservation policy discourse in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Policy, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
82 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decline of ‘biodiversity’ in conservation policy discourse in Australia
Published in
Environmental Science & Policy, November 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.016
Authors

Alexander M. Kusmanoff, Fiona Fidler, Ascelin Gordon, Sarah A. Bekessy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 12%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2017.
All research outputs
#886,585
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Policy
#128
of 2,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,737
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Policy
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.