You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
|
---|---|
Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael D. Clark, Domino Determann, Stavros Petrou, Domenico Moro, Esther W. de Bekker-Grob |
Abstract |
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 7 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 603 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 107 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 17% |
Student > Master | 88 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 6% |
Other | 119 | 19% |
Unknown | 124 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 123 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 58 | 9% |
Psychology | 29 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 26 | 4% |
Other | 124 | 20% |
Unknown | 157 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,463,210
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#189
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,706
of 243,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.