↓ Skip to main content

The chimpanzee mind: in search of the evolutionary roots of the human mind

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The chimpanzee mind: in search of the evolutionary roots of the human mind
Published in
Animal Cognition, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10071-009-0277-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuro Matsuzawa

Abstract

The year 2008 marks the 60th anniversary of Japanese primatology. Kinji Imanishi (1902-1992) first visited Koshima island in 1948 to study wild Japanese monkeys,and to explore the evolutionary origins of human society. This year is also the 30th anniversary of the Ai project:the chimpanzee Ai first touched the keyboard connected to a computer system in 1978. This paper summarizes the historical background of the Ai project,whose principal aim is to understand the evolutionary origins of the human mind. The present paper also aims to present a theoretical framework for the discipline called comparative cognitive science (CCS). CCS is characterized by the collective efforts of researchers employing a variety of methods, together taking a holistic approach to understand the minds of nonhuman animals. While the researchers of animals usually carry out experiments in the laboratory and conduct observational studies in the natural habitat, a different permutation is also possible. Field experiments can be carried out in the natural habitat, and observational studies can be in the laboratory. Such a two-by -two- contingency table based on location and research method thus provides the basis for a holistic approach. CCS provides a unique window on understanding the chimpanzee mind as a whole. The studies of the chimpanzee mind may also result in illuminating the evolutionary roots of the human mind.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 23%
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,456,314
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#511
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,126
of 90,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.