↓ Skip to main content

A network framework of cultural history

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
182 X users
weibo
5 weibo users
facebook
23 Facebook pages
googleplus
21 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
464 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A network framework of cultural history
Published in
Science, August 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1240064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maximilian Schich, Chaoming Song, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Alexander Mirsky, Mauro Martino, Albert-László Barabási, Dirk Helbing

Abstract

The emergent processes driving cultural history are a product of complex interactions among large numbers of individuals, determined by difficult-to-quantify historical conditions. To characterize these processes, we have reconstructed aggregate intellectual mobility over two millennia through the birth and death locations of more than 150,000 notable individuals. The tools of network and complexity theory were then used to identify characteristic statistical patterns and determine the cultural and historical relevance of deviations. The resulting network of locations provides a macroscopic perspective of cultural history, which helps us to retrace cultural narratives of Europe and North America using large-scale visualization and quantitative dynamical tools and to derive historical trends of cultural centers beyond the scope of specific events or narrow time intervals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 182 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 464 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 2%
Germany 7 2%
United Kingdom 7 2%
Spain 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 407 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 120 26%
Researcher 92 20%
Student > Master 57 12%
Other 32 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 6%
Other 93 20%
Unknown 42 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 15%
Computer Science 60 13%
Social Sciences 54 12%
Physics and Astronomy 35 8%
Arts and Humanities 28 6%
Other 153 33%
Unknown 65 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 460. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#60,386
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,280
of 83,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#419
of 240,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#25
of 912 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,260 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 912 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.