↓ Skip to main content

Histone acetylation in astrocytes suppresses GFAP and stimulates a reorganization of the intermediate filament network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histone acetylation in astrocytes suppresses GFAP and stimulates a reorganization of the intermediate filament network
Published in
Journal of Cell Science, January 2014
DOI 10.1242/jcs.145912
Pubmed ID
Authors

Regina Kanski, Marjolein A. M. Sneeboer, Emma J. van Bodegraven, Jacqueline A. Sluijs, Wietske Kropff, Marit W. Vermunt, Menno P. Creyghton, Lidia De Filippis, Angelo Vescovi, Eleonora Aronica, Paula van Tijn, Miriam E. van Strien, Elly M. Hol

Abstract

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) is the main intermediate filament in astrocytes and is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms during development. We demonstrate that histone acetylation controls GFAP expression also in mature astrocytes. Inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs) with Trichostatin-A or Sodium-butyrate reduced GFAP expression in primary human astrocytes and astrocytoma cells. Since splicing occurs co-transcriptional, we investigated whether histone acetylation changes the ratio between the canonical isoform GFAPα and the alternative GFAPδ splice-variant. We observed that decreased transcription of GFAP enhanced alternative isoform expression, as HDAC inhibition increased the GFAPδ/α ratio favouring GFAPδ. Expression of GFAPδ was dependent on the presence and binding of the splicing factors of the SR protein family. Inhibition of HDAC activity also resulted in aggregation of the GFAP network, reminiscent to our earlier findings of a GFAPδ-induced network collapse. Together, our data demonstrate that HDAC inhibition results in changes in transcription, splicing, and organization of GFAP. These data imply that a tight regulation of histone acetylation in astrocytes is essential, since dysregulation of gene expression causes aggregation of GFAP, a hallmark of human diseases like Alexander's disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 83 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 22 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Science
#6,547
of 9,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,481
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Science
#120
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.