You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rising CO2 Levels Will Intensify Phytoplankton Blooms in Eutrophic and Hypertrophic Lakes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0104325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jolanda M. H. Verspagen, Dedmer B. Van de Waal, Jan F. Finke, Petra M. Visser, Ellen Van Donk, Jef Huisman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 16% |
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 78 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,480,430
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,065
of 220,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,564
of 239,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,334
of 4,720 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,720 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.