You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LOFAR tied-array imaging of Type III solar radio bursts⋆
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Astronomy and Astrophysics, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1051/0004-6361/201423936 |
| Authors |
D. E. Morosan, P. T. Gallagher, P. Zucca, R. Fallows, E. P. Carley, G. Mann, M. M. Bisi, A. Kerdraon, A. A. Konovalenko, A. L. MacKinnon, H. O. Rucker, B. Thidé, J. Magdalenić, C. Vocks, H. Reid, J. Anderson, A. Asgekar, I. M. Avruch, M. J. Bentum, G. Bernardi, P. Best, A. Bonafede, J. Bregman, F. Breitling, J. Broderick, M. Brüggen, H. R. Butcher, B. Ciardi, J. E. Conway, F. de Gasperin, E. de Geus, A. Deller, S. Duscha, J. Eislöffel, D. Engels, H. Falcke, C. Ferrari, W. Frieswijk, M. A. Garrett, J. Grießmeier, A. W. Gunst, T. E. Hassall, J. W. T. Hessels, M. Hoeft, J. Hörandel, A. Horneffer, M. Iacobelli, E. Juette, A. Karastergiou, V. I. Kondratiev, M. Kramer, M. Kuniyoshi, G. Kuper, P. Maat, S. Markoff, J. P. McKean, D. D. Mulcahy, H. Munk, A. Nelles, M. J. Norden, E. Orru, H. Paas, M. Pandey-Pommier, V. N. Pandey, G. Pietka, R. Pizzo, A. G. Polatidis, W. Reich, H. Röttgering, A. M. M. Scaife, D. Schwarz, M. Serylak, O. Smirnov, B. W. Stappers, A. Stewart, M. Tagger, Y. Tang, C. Tasse, S. Thoudam, C. Toribio, R. Vermeulen, R. J. van Weeren, O. Wucknitz, S. Yatawatta, P. Zarka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| Finland | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 26 | 65% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Energy | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,459,471
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Astronomy and Astrophysics
#12,734
of 25,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,716
of 247,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Astronomy and Astrophysics
#51
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.