↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of Mindfulness Training for Mental Health Staff: Organizational Context and Stakeholder Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Mindfulness, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of Mindfulness Training for Mental Health Staff: Organizational Context and Stakeholder Perspectives
Published in
Mindfulness, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12671-014-0330-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Byron, Douglas M. Ziedonis, Caroline McGrath, Jean A. Frazier, Fernando deTorrijos, Carl Fulwiler

Abstract

Occupational stress and burnout adversely impacts mental health care staff well-being and patient outcomes. Mindfulness training reduces staff stress and may improve patient care. However, few studies explore mental health setting implementation. This qualitative study used focus groups to evaluate stakeholders' perceptions of organizational factors affecting implementation of an adapted version of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) for staff on adolescent mental health units. Common facilitators included leadership securing buy-in with staff, allocating staff time to participate, and quiet space for training and practice. Other facilitators were past staff knowledge of mindfulness, local champions, and acculturating staff with mindfulness through a non-mandatory training attendance policy. Common barriers were limited staff time to attend training sessions and insufficient training coverage for some staff. Staff also reported improved focus when interacting with adolescents and improved social cohesion on the units. We conclude that a mindfulness-based program for reducing occupational stress can be successfully implemented on adolescent mental health units. Implementation appeared to change the social context of the units, including staff and patient interactions. More broadly, our findings highlight the importance of environmental factors in shaping attitudes, diffusion of innovation, and acculturation of wellness program implementations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 51 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,303,896
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Mindfulness
#1,001
of 1,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,280
of 230,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mindfulness
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.