You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Recovery of neurocognitive functions following sustained abstinence after substance dependence and implications for treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Psychology Review, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.08.002 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mieke H.J. Schulte, Janna Cousijn, Tess E. den Uyl, Anna E. Goudriaan, Wim van den Brink, Dick J. Veltman, Thelma Schilt, Reinout W. Wiers |
Abstract |
Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) have been associated with impaired neurocognitive functioning, which may (partly) improve with sustained abstinence. New treatments are emerging, aimed at improving cognitive functions, and being tested. However, no integrated review is available regarding neurocognitive recovery following sustained abstinence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 216 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
Researcher | 26 | 12% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Other | 46 | 21% |
Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 85 | 39% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 13% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 9% |
Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,064,177
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#736
of 1,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,957
of 247,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.