↓ Skip to main content

Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dutch version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00787-003-0341-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigit M. van Widenfelt, Arnold W. Goedhart, Philip D. A. Treffers, Robert Goodman

Abstract

A Dutch translation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was made. In the first wave of data collection, self-report data of 11- to 16-yearolds (N = 970) were collected on the SDQ and other measures of psychopathology. In the second wave of data collection, extended versions of the SDQ were completed by 11- to 16-year-olds (N = 268), by parents of 8- to 16-year-olds (N = 300) and by teachers of 8- to 12-year-olds (N = 208); in addition, the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) was completed by the parents and the Youth Self Report (YSR) by the 11- to 16-year-olds. The results reveal that the internal consistency of the teacher SDQ is good; and the parent and self-report SDQ are generally acceptable and comparable with the internal consistencies of CBCL/YSR. The mean inter-informant product-moment correlations of the SDQ scales were satisfactory (parent-teacher 0.38; teacher-self-report 0.27; parent-self-report 0.35) and comparable with the mean inter-informant correlations of the CBCL and YSR (0.34). The inter-informant rank correlations of the impact questions were also satisfactory (mean parent-teacher 0.48; mean parent-self-report 0.24). Concurrent validity with the other measures of psychopathology used in the present study was good.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 287 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 21%
Student > Master 51 17%
Researcher 42 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 4%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 57 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 14%
Social Sciences 32 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 70 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,456,596
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#279
of 1,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,992
of 132,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them